Implant Offer Patients With Very Low Myopia Alternative to Laser Surgery

Implantable collamer lenses can be as effective as laser refractive surgery in patients with low and very low myopia.

Implantation of phakic implantable collamer lenses is a safe and efficacious technique in patients with very low myopia, according to research published in Clinical Ophthalmology.

Investigators conducted a retrospective analysis with 1 year of follow up on patients with myopia less than -3.5 diopters (D) who received implantable collamer lenses. 

The study’s main outcomes included visual acuity, refractive outcomes, vault, and intraocular pressure (IOP) assessed at 1, 6 and 12 months.

A total of 82 eyes from 82 patients were included in the study. The mean patient age was 35.06±8.46 years (range, 21-56), and the mean spherical equivalent was -2.34±0.82 D (range -5.50 to -1.00). 

Our study confirms that ICL implantation is a very good alternative to [laser vision correction] for low myopia patients while also offering the previously mentioned advantages: reversibility, corneal compliance, non-induction of dry eye and excellent visual quality.

Among all patients, the mean spherical implantable collamer lens power was -3.04±0.78 D. In eyes that had a toric-implantable collamer lens implanted (30.5%), the mean cylinder power was +1.64±0.64 D. 

The investigators report that the efficacy index (1.07) and security index (1.09) remained stable for 12 months. They also report a mean vault of 513.78±262.87 μm and mean IOP of 15.63±2.17 mm Hg at 12 months.

“Our study confirms that ICL implantation is a very good alternative to [laser vision correction] for low myopia patients while also offering the previously mentioned advantages: reversibility, corneal compliance, non-induction of dry eye and excellent visual quality,” the investigators report.

References:

Alonso-Juárez E, Velázquez-Villoria D. Low diopter phakic implantable collamer lens: refractive and visual outcomes in low myopia and myopic astigmatism. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16(9):2969-2977. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S373378